Revenue financial control: margins, unit economics, and B2B pricing
Revenue financial control refers to the set of practices used to steer the commercial profitability of a B2B company. It rests on three pillars: unit economics (customer acquisition cost CAC, customer lifetime value LTV, profitability ratios), margins by segment (product, channel, geography), and pricing strategies (value-based, cost-plus, competitive). Rigorous financial control makes it possible to identify profitable growth levers, anticipate drift (CAC spiraling out of control, negative margins), and align the CFO and CRO on shared objectives. Without this discipline, even strong growth can mask value destruction that stays invisible until it's too late.
Why revenue financial control is critical in B2B
The specific challenges of B2B
B2B has characteristics that make financial control particularly complex:
- Long sales cycles: 3 to 18 months between first contact and signature
- High average deal size: significant CAC investment per deal
- Recurring models: SaaS, subscriptions, profitability plays out over time
- Complex segmentation: multiple personas, channels, geographies
- B2B pricing: one-to-one negotiations, structural discounts
The risks of uncontrolled growth
| Risk | Typical impact | Example |
|---|---|---|
| CAC spiraling out of control | LTV/CAC ratio < 1, every customer destroys value | Scaling marketing without optimization, unprofitable channels |
| Shrinking LTV | High churn, no upsell, lifetime < 24 months | Poor onboarding, weak product-market fit |
| Negative margins | Delivery costs > selling price | Pricing too low, unbilled custom services |
| Gut-feel pricing | 20-40% of revenue left on the table | No value-based pricing, fear of losing the deal |
| Disconnected forecast | Forecast vs. actual gap > 20%, impossible to steer | No CAC payback tracking, churn ignored |
Key stat: 68% of B2B scale-ups have no clear view of their customer acquisition cost by channel (SaaStr study, 2025).
Unit economics: the fundamentals
CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost)
Definition: total cost to acquire a new paying customer.
Formula:
CAC = (Marketing Costs + Sales Costs + Tools Costs) / Number of new customers
Calculation period: monthly, quarterly, annual (depending on sales cycle).
Components:
- Marketing: ads, content, events, marketing team salaries
- Sales: AE/BDR/SDR salaries, commissions, CRM tools
- Tools: licenses (Salesforce, HubSpot, LinkedIn Sales Nav, Lemlist)
Example:
- Monthly costs: €50k marketing + €80k sales + €5k tools = €135k
- New customers: 15
- CAC = €9,000
Variants:
- Blended CAC: all channels combined (macro view)
- CAC by channel: organic, paid, outbound, partnerships (steering view)
- CAC by segment: SMB, mid-market, enterprise (pricing strategy)
LTV (Lifetime Value)
Definition: net revenue generated by a customer over their entire lifetime.
Basic formula:
LTV = ARPA × Lifetime (months) × Gross Margin %
Advanced formula (SaaS):
LTV = (ARPA × Gross Margin %) / Monthly Churn Rate
Example:
- ARPA: €500/month
- Gross Margin: 80%
- Monthly churn: 3% (lifetime = 1/0.03 = 33 months)
- LTV = (500 × 0.80) / 0.03 = €13,333
Pitfalls to avoid:
- Ignoring churn in the calculation (fantasy LTV)
- Not factoring in upsell (expansion revenue = +30-60% of LTV)
- Forgetting gross margin (confusing revenue with profit)
- Using churn from month 0 (customers too recent, survivorship bias)
CAC Payback Period
Definition: time needed to recover the CAC through the margin generated.
Formula:
CAC Payback (months) = CAC / (MRR × Gross Margin %)
Example:
- CAC: €9,000
- Average MRR: €500
- Gross Margin: 80%
- CAC Payback = 9,000 / (500 × 0.80) = 22.5 months
B2B benchmarks:
- < 12 months: excellent (efficient model)
- 12-18 months: good (SaaS standard)
- 18-24 months: acceptable (if LTV > 5× CAC)
- > 24 months: red alert (cash risk, weak leverage)
Strategic use:
- Cash management: anticipate financing needs
- Channel arbitration: prioritize channels with payback < 12 months
- Sales optimization: shorten the sales cycle for faster payback
LTV/CAC Ratio
Definition: unit profitability of a customer.
Formula:
LTV/CAC Ratio = LTV / CAC
Benchmarks:
- < 1: value destruction (absolute emergency)
- 1-3: danger (unprofitable growth)
- 3-5: target zone (growth/profitability balance)
- > 5: underinvestment (scaling opportunity)
Example:
- LTV: €13,333
- CAC: €9,000
- Ratio = 1.48: dangerous zone, LTV needs improvement (reduce churn, upsell) or CAC needs optimization (better channels)
The B2B magic triangle:
| Metric | Benchmark |
|---|---|
| LTV/CAC | > 3 |
| CAC Payback | < 12 months |
| Gross Margin | > 70% |
If all three are green, the result is scalable, profitable growth.
Margins: steering by segment, product, and channel
Gross Margin vs Contribution Margin
Gross Margin:
Gross Margin % = (Revenue - COGS) / Revenue
- COGS: direct costs (hosting, support, delivery, third-party licenses)
- SaaS benchmark: 70-85%
- B2B services benchmark: 40-60%
Contribution Margin:
Contribution Margin = Revenue - COGS - Variable Costs (Sales, Marketing)
- Key metric for unit profitability
- Determines whether each deal is profitable before fixed costs
Example:
- Deal: €10,000 ARR
- COGS: €2,000 (hosting, support)
- CAC: €6,000
- Gross Margin = (10k - 2k) / 10k = 80%
- Contribution Margin = 10k - 2k - 6k = €2,000 (20%)
Margin analysis by segment
Recommended segmentation:
| Dimension | Why | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Product | Identify unprofitable products | Feature A (85% margin) vs. Feature B (30% margin) |
| Channel | Optimize the acquisition mix | Outbound (CAC €12k) vs. Inbound (CAC €4k) |
| Geography | Adapt pricing and go-to-market | France (75% margin) vs. USA (60% margin, high CAC) |
| Customer size | Align resources with value | SMB (CAC €3k, LTV €8k) vs. Enterprise (CAC €50k, LTV €300k) |
| Vertical | Sector specialization | Finance (high willingness to pay) vs. Retail (price-sensitive) |
Decision matrix:
| Segment | Margin | CAC Payback | LTV/CAC | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise SaaS | 82% | 18 months | 4.2 | Scale (invest) |
| SMB SaaS | 78% | 9 months | 3.8 | Optimize (automate) |
| Custom services | 45% | 24 months | 1.9 | Reduce (standardize or exit) |
| Freemium to paid | 80% | 6 months | 5.1 | Accelerate (priority channel) |
Margin warning signals
Drift indicators:
- Declining gross margin: COGS growing faster than pricing
- Negative contribution margin: each customer costs more than they bring in
- Planned vs. actual margin gap > 10%: poorly calibrated pricing, unchecked discounting
- Segments with margin < 40% that represent > 30% of revenue
Common causes:
- Unbilled custom services: "we'll make an exception" × 50 customers
- Structural discounting: a 30% discount to close a deal becomes the norm
- Feature creep: COGS spiraling to satisfy 3 major customers
- Legacy pricing: old contracts underbilled, too costly to renegotiate
Pricing strategies: beyond cost-plus
The 4 B2B pricing approaches
| Strategy | Logic | Advantages | Risks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost-Plus | Costs + fixed margin (e.g., +40%) | Simple, guaranteed margin | Leaves value on the table |
| Competitive | Aligning with competitors | Easy to justify | Race to the bottom |
| Value-Based | Price = % of value created for the customer | Maximum value capture | Complex to measure |
| Tiered/Packaging | Small/Pro/Enterprise plans | Segments by willingness to pay | Cannibalization between tiers |
Stat: companies using value-based pricing capture 20-30% more revenue than cost-plus pricing (McKinsey study, 2024).
Value-based pricing: how it works
Principle: the price reflects the perceived value to the customer, not your costs.
A 5-step method:
-
Quantify the value:
- Time saved: 10h/week saved × €50/h × 50 weeks = €25k/year
- Revenue gain: +15% conversion = +€200k ARR
- Cost reduction: -30% of tools replaced = -€40k/year
-
Identify the value metric:
- SaaS analytics: number of users, events tracked
- CRM: number of contacts, deals
- E-commerce platform: GMV, transactions
-
Set the price at 10-20% of the value created:
- Value created: €100k/year
- Target price: €10-20k/year ARR
- Value capture ratio = 10-20%
-
Test willingness to pay:
- Customer survey: "What price would be too high? Too low? Acceptable?"
- A/B testing pricing pages (if volume allows)
- Sales discovery: "What budget do you have to solve this problem?"
-
Iterate by segment:
- SMB: value €20k, price €3k (15% capture)
- Enterprise: value €500k, price €80k (16% capture)
Real-world example (B2B CRM):
- Before (cost-plus): €200/month (COGS €60 + 70% margin)
- Measured value: +25% of deals closed = +€300k ARR for a typical customer
- After (value-based): €2,000/month (0.8% of the value created)
- Result: 10x on pricing, identical churn, CAC payback cut by 3
Tiered pricing: structuring the plans
Typical B2B SaaS structure:
| Plan | Price | Value metric | Target | Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | €99/month | 1-5 users, basic features | SMBs, testing | Acquisition (low barrier) |
| Professional | €499/month | 6-20 users, advanced analytics | Scale-ups | Revenue (80% of customers) |
| Enterprise | €2,000/month | Unlimited, SLA, dedicated CSM | Key accounts | LTV (expansion, stability) |
| Custom | Quote-based | API, SSO, multi-entities | Corporates | Margins (deal-based pricing) |
Golden rules:
- 3-5x gap between tiers: wide enough to segment, not so wide it cannibalizes
- Feature anchor: 1-2 key features per tier (not 47 rows in a table)
- 80% on the middle tier: avoid everyone picking the low plan
- Clear upsell path: automatic triggers (usage > 80%, upgrade prompt)
Anti-patterns:
- Too many tiers: confusion, analysis paralysis
- "Per user" pricing with no justification: metric disconnected from value
- Free or €9 "Lite" plans: attracts non-payers, pollutes the pipeline
Advanced profitability metrics
Rule of 40
Definition: a SaaS health indicator combining growth and profitability.
Formula:
Rule of 40 = ARR Growth (%) + EBITDA Margin (%)
Benchmarks:
- > 40%: excellent balance (investable)
- 30-40%: good (late-stage standard)
- < 30%: alert (weak growth OR significant losses)
Examples:
| Company | ARR Growth | EBITDA Margin | Rule of 40 | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyper-growth startup | 120% | -30% | 90% | Excellent (invest for growth) |
| Profitable scale-up | 40% | 10% | 50% | Very good (balanced) |
| Stagnation | 10% | 5% | 15% | Alert (neither growth nor profit) |
Use cases:
- Growth vs. profitability trade-off: accept losses if growth is strong
- Strategic pivot: slow growth to improve margin if below 30%
- Fundraising: Rule of 40 > 50% = a killer argument for investors
Magic Number
Definition: the efficiency of each dollar invested in sales & marketing.
Formula:
Magic Number = (Current Quarter ARR - Prior Quarter ARR) × 4 / (Prior Quarter S&M Spend)
Interpretation:
- > 1.0: excellent (every $ invested generates > $1 of annualized ARR)
- 0.75-1.0: good (efficient growth)
- < 0.75: inefficient (too expensive to acquire ARR)
Example:
- Q1 2026 ARR: €2M
- Q4 2025 ARR: €1.5M
- Q4 2025 S&M: €400k
- Magic Number = (2M - 1.5M) × 4 / 400k = 5
- Verdict: exceptional, a highly efficient growth machine
Link to CAC Payback:
CAC Payback ≈ 12 months / Magic Number
If Magic Number = 1, then CAC Payback = 12 months.
ARR per Employee
Definition: the organization's revenue productivity.
Formula:
ARR per Employee = Total ARR / Number of employees
B2B SaaS benchmarks:
- < €100k: early-stage, heavy structure
- €100-200k: standard scale-up
- €200-500k: efficient (product-led growth)
- > €500k: exceptional (Atlassian, pre-COVID Zoom = $600k+)
Improvement levers:
- Sales automation: self-serve, automated demos
- Product-led growth: freemium, viral loops
- Lean tech stack: no-code, integrations vs. custom development
- Offshore/nearshore: relocate support, delivery
Evaluez votre maturite sur les 8 piliers en 2 minutes. Score instantane, gratuit.
Faire le quiz gratuit →Revenue financial governance: CFO and CRO
The 3 classic conflicts
| Tension | CFO view | CRO view | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Maximize margin, avoid discounts | Close the deal, pricing flexibility | Discount policy: max discount by deal size, approval required above 20% |
| S&M investment | Short-term ROI, CAC Payback < 12 months | Aggressive scaling, accept 18-24 month payback | Magic Number target: invest if > 0.75 |
| Forecast | Conservative (95%+ attainment) | Ambitious (stretch goals) | Dual forecast: commit (80% confidence) + upside (50% confidence) |
The Revenue Board: strategic alignment
Participants: CEO, CFO, CRO, VP Product, VP Customer Success.
Frequency: monthly (2 hours).
Typical agenda:
-
Revenue performance (20 min)
- Current ARR vs. target
- New ARR, Expansion, Churn (net retention)
- Pipeline coverage (3-4x the target)
-
Unit economics (20 min)
- CAC by channel (M-1, M-3, M-12 trend)
- LTV/CAC ratio by segment
- CAC Payback period
- Contribution margin by product
-
Forecast & runway (20 min)
- Forecast for Q+1, Q+2
- Burn rate, runway (months of cash)
- Scenarios (best/likely/worst case)
-
Pricing & investment decisions (40 min)
- Pricing adjustments (new tiers, price increases)
- S&M budget trade-offs (channel reallocation)
- Go/No-Go on new markets, segments
-
Risks & mitigations (20 min)
- Top 3 revenue risks (e.g., enterprise churn, weak SMB pipeline)
- Corrective actions, ownership, deadline
Output: shared slide deck, decisions logged, OKRs adjusted.
A unified CFO-CRO dashboard
Key metrics to share:
| Category | Metrics | Frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ARR, MRR, New ARR, Expansion, Churn | Weekly | CRO |
| Pipeline | Coverage ratio, Velocity, Win rate | Weekly | CRO |
| Unit economics | CAC, LTV, LTV/CAC, Payback | Monthly | CFO + CRO |
| Margins | Gross margin, Contribution margin by segment | Monthly | CFO |
| Profitability | EBITDA, Rule of 40, Magic Number | Quarterly | CFO |
| Cash | Burn rate, Runway, Collections (DSO) | Weekly | CFO |
Tools:
- Source of truth: CRM (Salesforce, HubSpot) + ERP (Sage, NetSuite)
- BI: Tableau, Metabase, Looker (real-time dashboards)
- Reconciliation: monthly CFO-CRO process to validate the numbers (gap < 2%)
B2B & SaaS Benchmarks (2025-2026)
Unit economics by segment
| Segment | CAC | LTV | LTV/CAC | Payback | Gross Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMB SaaS | €1-3k | €5-15k | 3-5 | 6-12 months | 75-85% |
| Mid-Market SaaS | €10-30k | €50-150k | 4-6 | 12-18 months | 70-80% |
| Enterprise SaaS | €50-200k | €300k-2M | 5-10 | 18-36 months | 65-75% |
| PLG (Product-Led Growth) | €500-2k | €8-25k | 8-12 | 3-9 months | 80-90% |
Source: OpenView SaaS Benchmarks 2025, KeyBanc SaaS Survey 2026.
Growth & profitability
| Stage | ARR | YoY Growth | EBITDA Margin | Rule of 40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed/Series A | < €1M | 200-500% | -50% to -100% | 100-400% |
| Series B | €1-10M | 100-200% | -30% to -50% | 50-150% |
| Series C+ | €10-50M | 50-100% | -10% to +10% | 40-110% |
| Pre-IPO | > €50M | 30-60% | 0% to +20% | 30-80% |
Churn & retention
| Metric | SMB | Mid-Market | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly logo churn | 3-5% | 1-2% | 0.5-1% |
| Monthly ARR churn | 2-3% | 1-1.5% | 0.3-0.8% |
| Net Revenue Retention | 90-100% | 100-110% | 110-130% |
| Gross Revenue Retention | 85-92% | 92-97% | 95-99% |
NRR > 100% = expansion revenue offsets churn (a sign of product-market fit).
Fatal mistakes to avoid
1. Gut-feel pricing
Symptoms:
- "Let's go with €500/month, that seems about right"
- Ad hoc discounts with no logic (10% to 40% depending on the rep's mood)
- No willingness-to-pay analysis
Consequences:
- 20-40% of revenue left on the table
- Margins eroded by unchecked discounting
- Customers used to negotiating (never full price)
Fix:
- Value-based pricing: quantify the value created
- Discount policy: a discount grid by deal size
- A/B testing: test several prices on comparable segments
2. Ignoring churn in the LTV calculation
Mistake:
LTV = ARPA × 36 months (arbitrary duration with no real measurement)
Reality:
- Monthly churn is 4%, so lifetime = 25 months (not 36)
- LTV overestimated by 44%, so investment decisions are skewed
Consequence:
- CAC looks "acceptable" on paper (LTV/CAC = 3.5)
- In reality: value destruction (true ratio = 2.2)
Fix:
- Measure churn: cohort analysis, retention curves
- Mature cohort: use customers at > 12 months to estimate LTV
- Conservative LTV: apply a discount (×0.8) to offset uncertainty
3. No margin segmentation
Symptom:
- "Our margin is at 65%, that's fine"
- No analysis by product, channel, geography
Hidden reality:
- Product A: 85% margin (80% of revenue)
- Product B: -10% margin (20% of revenue)
- Blended margin: 85%×0.8 + (-10%)×0.2 = 66% (fine on paper)
- But Product B is destroying value, so urgent corrective action is needed
Fix:
- P&L by segment: product, channel, region
- Quarterly review: identify segments below 40% margin
- Decisions: exit, re-pricing, or transform into an upsell
4. Forecast disconnected from cash
Mistake:
- ARR forecast: +50% YoY
- Monthly burn: €200k
- Runway: 8 months
- Contradiction: growth requires S&M investment, so burn will increase and runway will drop below 6 months
Consequence:
- Panic at month 6: emergency fundraising
- Raising on bad terms (excessive dilution)
Fix:
- Cash forecast: project the burn over 18 months
- CAC Payback: factor in the cash timing gap (cash out before cash in)
- Scenario planning: best/likely/worst case, adjust burn based on the pipeline
5. CFO and CRO who don't talk to each other
Symptom:
- The CFO discovers the revenue numbers 15 days after close
- The CRO doesn't know the burn rate or the runway
- Pricing decisions made in a silo
Consequence:
- Strategic misalignment (CFO pumps the brakes, CRO hits the gas)
- Erratic forecasting (2 different versions)
- Missed opportunities (no quick channel arbitration)
Fix:
- Monthly Revenue Board (see governance section)
- Shared dashboard: a single source of truth
- Shared OKRs: LTV/CAC, Rule of 40, Net Retention
Action plan: implementing revenue financial control
Phase 1: Measure (Month 1)
Objective: establish the unit economics baseline.
-
Calculate CAC:
- Extract S&M costs for the last 6 months
- Count new customers per month
- Segment by channel (inbound, outbound, partnerships)
-
Estimate LTV:
- Calculate ARPA (ARR / number of customers)
- Measure monthly churn (cohort > 6 months)
- Apply the formula: LTV = (ARPA × Gross Margin) / Churn
-
Build the dashboard:
- Key metrics: ARR, CAC, LTV, LTV/CAC, Payback, Gross Margin
- Frequency: weekly (revenue), monthly (unit economics)
Deliverable: a "Unit Economics Baseline" deck (10 slides).
Phase 2: Segment (Month 2)
Objective: identify profitable segments vs. value destroyers.
-
P&L by segment:
- Product (SKU 1, SKU 2, Services)
- Channel (Inbound, Outbound, Partners)
- Customer size (SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise)
-
Decision matrix:
- X axis: LTV/CAC
- Y axis: Contribution margin %
- Top-right quadrant: aggressive scaling
- Bottom-left quadrant: exit or transformation
Deliverable: a "Priority Segments" table with an action plan.
Phase 3: Optimize pricing (Months 3-4)
Objective: capture 10-20% more revenue.
-
Value quantification:
- Customer survey: "What monetary value does our product bring you?"
- Sales discovery: log customer metrics (time saved, revenue generated)
-
New pricing:
- Set the price at 10-15% of the value created
- Test on new customers (A/B test if volume allows)
- Grandfather existing customers (or migrate them gradually)
-
Discount policy:
- Discount grid: < €10k (0-10%), €10-50k (10-20%), > €50k (20-30%)
- CEO approval required for discounts > 25%
Deliverable: new pricing published, sales training.
Phase 4: Governance (Months 5-6)
Objective: align the CFO and CRO on ongoing steering.
-
Revenue Board:
- Set up the monthly meeting
- Shared dashboard (Tableau, Metabase)
- Shared OKRs: LTV/CAC > 3, Rule of 40 > 40%, NRR > 105%
-
Forecast process:
- Weekly: pipeline review (CRO)
- Monthly: ARR forecast (CRO + CFO)
- Quarterly: S&M budget, hiring plan (CFO + CRO + CEO)
-
Automatic alerts:
- Monthly CAC > +20% vs. baseline: alert CRO
- Churn > 3% (SaaS): alert CS + CRO
- Gross margin < 70%: alert CFO
Deliverable: a "Revenue Governance" playbook (documented process).
Use cases: before/after financial control
Example 1: SaaS scale-up (€20M ARR)
Starting situation:
- Growth: +80% YoY
- Burn: €500k/month
- Runway: 14 months
- Problem: no visibility into unit economics
Diagnosis:
- Blended CAC: €12k
- LTV: €35k
- LTV/CAC = 2.9 (below the threshold of 3)
- CAC Payback: 22 months (too long)
- Segmentation:
- Inbound: CAC €6k, LTV €40k, i.e. a ratio of 6.7 (excellent)
- Outbound: CAC €18k, LTV €28k, i.e. a ratio of 1.6 (value destruction)
Actions:
- Cut outbound: save €150k/month in S&M
- Scale inbound: +€100k/month in content, SEO, paid
- Pricing +20%: value-based pricing (from €500 to €600/month MRR)
Results after 6 months:
- Blended CAC: €7k (-42%)
- LTV: €48k (+37% thanks to pricing)
- LTV/CAC = 6.9 (excellence zone)
- Burn: €300k/month (-40%)
- Runway: 24 months
- Growth: still +70% YoY (a slight, acceptable deceleration)
Example 2: B2B services SMB (€2M revenue)
Starting situation:
- Pricing: cost-plus (costs + 30%)
- Net margin: 8%
- No recurrence, one-off projects
Diagnosis:
- No LTV (customers don't come back)
- Custom services: 25-35% margin, but variable effort
- No standardized pricing
Actions:
- Productize the services: 3 fixed packages (Starter €5k, Pro €15k, Premium €40k)
- Value-based pricing: quantify customer ROI (savings vs. an in-house hire)
- Recurrence: annual contract with monthly deliverables (retainer)
Results after 12 months:
- 60% of revenue is recurring (ARR = €1.2M)
- Net margin: 22% (+14 pts)
- LTV: €45k (average contract length = 30 months)
- CAC: €8k (sales + marketing)
- LTV/CAC = 5.6
- Company valuation: 3x (shift from a project model to a SaaS-like model)
Conclusion
Revenue financial control isn't a brake on growth, it's an accelerator. B2B companies that master their unit economics (CAC, LTV, payback), segment their margins, and adopt pricing based on the value they create capture 20-40% more revenue and cut their cash-crunch risk by 60%+. For companies in a B2B scaling phase, this discipline is the difference between sustainable growth and gradual value destruction.
The 5 non-negotiable pillars:
- Measure: CAC, LTV, LTV/CAC, Payback, Gross Margin by segment
- Segment: identify profitable segments vs. value destroyers
- Optimize pricing: value-based, not cost-plus
- Govern: a CFO-CRO Revenue Board, a shared dashboard
- Iterate: quarterly review, quick adjustments
Next steps:
- Calculate your LTV/CAC today (2 hours, a spreadsheet is enough)
- Segment your margins by channel/product (1 day)
- Implement a monthly Revenue Board (template in this article)
- Test a +15% price increase on new customers (4 weeks)
The time to act is now, not when your runway hits 6 months.
Additional resources: